MGMA Connexion Debunks Four Common Coding Myths

An article published in the March 2011 edition of MGMA Connexion debunks four common coding myths, according to an AAPC release.

The following coding myths are discussed by Jen Hume, CPC, CPMA, CEMC:

Myth #1: Purposeful undercoding prevents audits. "Undercoding not only results in providers losing money on services rendered, it can actually prompt an audit," Ms. Hume said.

Myth #2: Payment equals accuracy. "The number one reason for an audit was insufficient documentation on bills submitted for payment," Ms. Hume said.

Myth #3: Practices that don't accept Medicare patients are not at risk for Medicare recovery audit contractor audits.

Myth #4: Size doesn't matter. "Even the smallest practices can be audited," Ms. Hume said.

Read the AAPC release on coding myths.

Access MGMA's virtual Connexion for additional information and a sneak peak at the magazine and article.

Read more on coding:

-Preparing Your Surgery Center for ICD-10: 6 Initial Steps

-AAPC Column Outlines 2011 CPT Changes to ENT Procedures

-Minneapolis Calls for Medical Coders in Face of ICD-10



Copyright © 2024 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

 

Articles We Think You'll Like

 

Featured Whitepapers

Featured Webinars