Dual coding may be necessary to help practices implement ICD-10, but it will also cost money and productivity, according to a Government Health IT report.
Dual coding allows for the assessment of both ICD-9 and ICD-10 processes, including internal systems and medical coder knowledge. However, to cover the work increase, practices may need to hire additional dual coders or accept longer reimbursement cycles.
Starting sooner, rather than later, can minimize dual coding's negative long-term impact on a practice once the Oct. 1 deadline arrives.
More Articles on Coding, Billing and Collections:
Opinion: ICD-10 May Be Missed Opportunity for Productive Change
MGMA: Only 10% Providers Ready for ICD-10
3 Steps for Physicians to Take When Dropped From a Health Plan
Dual coding allows for the assessment of both ICD-9 and ICD-10 processes, including internal systems and medical coder knowledge. However, to cover the work increase, practices may need to hire additional dual coders or accept longer reimbursement cycles.
Starting sooner, rather than later, can minimize dual coding's negative long-term impact on a practice once the Oct. 1 deadline arrives.
More Articles on Coding, Billing and Collections:
Opinion: ICD-10 May Be Missed Opportunity for Productive Change
MGMA: Only 10% Providers Ready for ICD-10
3 Steps for Physicians to Take When Dropped From a Health Plan